<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Reasonable Compensation Analysis Archives - Advent Valuation Advisors</title>
	<atom:link href="https://adventvalue.com/tag/reasonable-compensation-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>Business Valuation &#124; Forensic Accounting &#124; Litigation Support</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 20:14:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Compensation or Dividend: Know the Difference</title>
		<link>https://adventvalue.com/compensation-or-dividend-know-the-difference/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lorraine Barton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2021 15:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Valuation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Valuation New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable Compensation Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable Compensation Analysis New York]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://adventvalue.com/?p=2601</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Tax Court recently ruled that payments made to a corporate taxpayer&#8217;s three shareholders were dividends — not compensation for personal services rendered. The court&#8217;s reasoning also may be relevant in shareholder disputes and divorce cases when the parties disagree about whether compensation should be deducted from earnings when valuing a business interest. (Aspro, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://adventvalue.com/compensation-or-dividend-know-the-difference/">Compensation or Dividend: Know the Difference</a> appeared first on <a href="https://adventvalue.com">Advent Valuation Advisors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Landmark Compensation Case Turns 25</title>
		<link>https://adventvalue.com/landmark-compensation-case-turns-25/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[colorpageadmin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 18:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Valuation Hudson Valley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business Valuation New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable Compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable Compensation Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reasonable Compensation Analysis New York]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://adventvalue.com/?p=2178</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When is no compensation considered reasonable compensation? When an officer of a business is an officer in name only. That is one of the key takeaways of Davis v. United States, one of the landmark cases in the canon of compensation law. This is the 25 anniversary of Davis v. United States, and Paul Hamann [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://adventvalue.com/landmark-compensation-case-turns-25/">Landmark Compensation Case Turns 25</a> appeared first on <a href="https://adventvalue.com">Advent Valuation Advisors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
